Georgian Orthodox Church calls for Stalin icon to be changed

New "World" post from BBC News: Georgian Orthodox Church calls for Stalin icon to be changed https://ift.tt/gf7tDPd https://ift.tt/2fFm8UT

The Controversial Icon of Stalin and the Saint: A Clash of Faith and History in Georgia

A Divine Meeting Never Met?

In the heart of Tbilisi, a cathedral holds an icon stirring controversy. Depicting scenes from the life of St. Matrona of Moscow, a revered 20th-century Russian saint, it features a jarring image: the saint blessing none other than Joseph Stalin, the Soviet dictator responsible for the deaths of millions.

The Georgian Orthodox Church, custodians of the cathedral, have found themselves in a delicate dance. While acknowledging the icon's historical context, they maintain "insufficient evidence" proves the saint and Stalin ever crossed paths. Thus, they call upon the icon's donors to rectify the scene, or risk the Church taking action itself.

A Gift of Division, Not Devotion

The Alliance of Patriots, a pro-Russian party, gifted the icon months ago. However, it only ignited public outrage recently, highlighted by Giorgi Kandelaki, an opposition politician. He decried the portrayal of "one of the biggest mass murderers in history" in a positive light, sparking protests and paint-throwing incidents.

Nata Peradze, the activist who defaced the icon, saw it as a symbol of tyranny. With Stalin's legacy etched in her family's suffering, she couldn't bear the glorification of a tyrant. Her act, however, came at a cost: death threats and mob attacks on her home.

Stalin's Shadow in Georgia: A Complex Legacy

The icon controversy reflects the complex tapestry of Georgia's relationship with Stalin. Born in Gori, the country claims him as a native son, even as his reign of terror cast a long shadow. While many reject the Soviet legacy, some see Stalin with a twisted pride, a symbol of overcoming humble origins to rule a superpower and defeat Nazi Germany.

Navigating the Minefield of Faith and History

The Church's statement walks a tightrope. While acknowledging the icon's historical context, it distances itself from Stalin's glorification. Claiming icons can depict interactions with rulers and villains, they emphasize this doesn't equate to glorification.

The icon's fate hangs in the balance. Will the donors heed the Church's call? Will the controversy die down, or escalate further? Only time will tell how Georgia reconciles its faith with the ghosts of its past.